// Project_Portfolio · 04 / 14
Mykolaiv Combined Heat and Power Plant
6–35 kV protection restoration and substation automation reconstruction
6–35 kVMV/HV distribution
40 MWplant electrical capacity
Full scopeprotection + automation
Project context
Mykolaiv CHP is an urban combined heat and power facility supplying both electricity and district heat — roughly 40 MW of electrical capacity and 410 Gcal/h of thermal capacity. After damage and equipment obsolescence had left the 6–35 kV substation in a fragmented state, the project restored and modernised its electrical distribution and automation systems, folding a set of isolated repair tasks into one coordinated protection-and-automation solution.
Scope of work
- Restored relay-protection functions on 6–35 kV switchgear and reconstructed the automation required for dependable operation of the substation after damage and equipment obsolescence.
- Developed automated circuit-breaker protection and control logic, including trip supervision, breaker-status processing, interlocking and the backup actions required by the switchgear protection philosophy.
- Implemented a dedicated automation controller for switchgear control, operational interlocks and sequence handling, providing a consistent interface between field devices and the supervisory control layer.
- Reconstructed protection and control circuits across the 6–35 kV substation, including binary signal processing, breaker commands, alarm logic and equipment-state supervision.
- Integrated the restored switchgear automation with plant-level control and monitoring, validating indications, commands and alarm transmission between the substation and operator systems.
- Supported the broader technical reconstruction of the 6–35 kV substation, combining protection, breaker automation and control engineering into a single coordinated solution.
Systems & technologies
6–35 kV switchgearRelay protectionBreaker automationInterlockingTrip supervisionController logicBinary I/OSCADA integrationReconstruction
Engineering contribution
The project transformed isolated restoration tasks into a coherent protection-and-automation system. The emphasis was on operational safety, clear breaker-state logic, dependable trip paths and maintainable control functions across the reconstructed substation.
Public plant context verified against Mykolaiv CHP and Ukrainian energy-regulator information.
More cases
All 14 casesFRA5 Data Centre — Mercury
Frankfurt, Germany · 2026
Amgen Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Facility
Dún Laoghaire, Ireland · 2026
Regional GridRegional Grid Integration
Valle del Cauca, Colombia · 2025
Mykolaiv Combined Heat and Power Plant
Mykolaiv, Ukraine · date withheld
PV Plant Inverter Transients — Power-Frequency Surge Analysis
Valle del Cauca, Colombia · 2024–25
115 kV Transmission Line — Conductor Sag & Failure Analysis
Valle del Cauca, Colombia · 2024–25
Power Equipment Failure Forensics — Multiphysics FEM
Colombia (Regional) · 2024–25
Middle Dnipro Hydroelectric Power Plant
Kamianske, Ukraine · date withheld
Kaniv Hydroelectric Power Plant
Kaniv, Ukraine · date withheld
Utility-Scale PVUtility-Scale PV Engineering
Alberta, Canada · 2024
HV SubstationHV Substation Diagnostics
Colombia (Regional) · 2024
Dnister Pumped Storage Power Plant
Dnister PSPP, Ukraine · date withheld
HV/MV Substation Design — Grounding, Shielding & Arrester Selection
Colombia · Chile · Mexico · USA · 2022–24
1.5 MWIndustrial PV Plant Recovery
Cali, Colombia · 2021